Hi Alvaro, The current text is better aligned with the informational status. If needed, the status can be changed to Standards Track (or BCP) during the WG progression of the document.
Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Date: Monday, August 19, 2024 at 1:13 PM To: Zafar Ali (zali) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, SPRING WG <[email protected]>, Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19) On August 19, 2024 at 1:03:58 PM, Zafar Ali wrote: Zafar: Hi! > I support the adoption call. > > However, I believe the document should be “informational.” Do you have a specific reason? The intended status should depend on the content and its relationship to other documents. It is too early to determine as this is still work in progress -- I'm sure this point will come up later as the document progresses through the WG. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
