Hi, Joel. I support this document. This draft is handy for constructing consistent symmetric paths using SR policies.
Thanks! Nat On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:50 PM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > My thanks to the non-editorial participants who have spoken up in > support of this draft. While we have not seen any objections, support > still is a bit less than the the chairs feel can be called WG support. > Given that recent notes from participants, rather than declaring failure > we are going to give this till then end of next week (i.e. end of day on > Feb 14, 2025) for additional folks to speak up in support. Or, if you > missed this and have concerns, please raise those. > > I also want to thank the supporters for being explicit about why they > are supporting publication. It is quite helpful to the chairs. > > Yours, > > Joel > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
