I support the WGLC with the following comments: Section 5.2 allows clients to request multiple IA_SRV6_LOCATOR options; Section 5.3 says server policy decides. To avoid interoperability divergence, consider recommending a default (e.g., "SHOULD assign a single locator unless explicitly configured")
Section 5.4 requires relay agents to generate SRv6 locator routes locally. is this mandatory, or only when relay also serves as BRAS? Privacy section assumes a "trusted SR domain"; suggest clarifying implications if CPEs/BRAS cross administrative boundaries (who owns locator assignment?) Nits / Editorial: Sometimes "IA_LOCATOR" is used instead of "IA_SRV6_LOCATOR". Recommend consistent use. LOC-Len definition: Section 4.2 implies LOC-Len = LB-Len + LN-Len, but never introduces "LOC-Len" explicitly. Worth defining clearly. Section 4.2 - "must be discarded" -> should use normative "MUST discard" per RFC 8174 language. Section 5.3: "The IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option fills with..." -> better phrased as "is filled with". Section 6.1: "implementation of implementation of" -> duplicate words, should be "implementation of". Wards, Linda This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document. Abstract: In an SRv6 network, each SRv6 Segment Endpoint Node must be assigned an SRv6 locator, and segment IDs are generated within the address space of this SRv6 locator. This document describes a method for assigning SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through DHCPv6. File can be retrieved from: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp/ Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are highly appreciated. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
