Document: draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments
Title: Introducing Resource Awareness to SR Segments
Reviewer: Himanshu Shah
Review result: Has Issues

Following text can be improvised for better reading –
“Although a centralized controller can have a global view of network
   state and can provision different services using different SR paths,
   in data packet forwarding it still relies on the DiffServ QoS
   mechanism [RFC2474] [RFC2475] to provide coarse-grained traffic
   differentiation in the network.”
--
Although a centralized controller can have a global view of network
   state and can provision different services using different SR paths.
   However, in data packet forwarding it still relies on the DiffServ QoS
   mechanism [RFC2474] [RFC2475] to provide coarse-grained traffic
   differentiation in the network.
--
In general, my view of this draft is that it mainly proposes using multiple
SIDs, each SID associated with some TE resource that can be taken advantage
mostly by controller for desired traffic engineering. So, it introduces the
‘high level’ concept (similar to L-LSP) without any other associated details
(IGP extensions, link attributes, etc) that are necessary to make it work as a
solution. But since this work is approved by the working group, it should be
categorized, perhaps as informational rather than standardized track. It also
appears that since one vendor has implemented the solution, this draft is more
of an effort to legitimize that as standards track but without the associated
details, there may or may not ever be an interoperable solution that IETF is
chartered to provide.



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to