Hi,
I support adoption of this draft. From: 王亚蓉 <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 1:06 AM To: spring <[email protected]> Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01 Hi WG, I support WG Adoption of this draft. Thanks , Yarong Wang 发件人: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2025年10月29日 21:32 收件人: SPRING WG List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 抄送: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 主题: WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01 Dear WG: This message starts a three-week adoption call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization, ending on November/19. >From the Abstract: Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any path. SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions) that represent a source-routed policy. The packets steered into an SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR Policy. An SR Policy can be instantiated SR-MPLS and SRv6 data planes. In some use cases, an SRv6 Policy's SID list ends with the policy endpoint's node SID, and the traffic steered (over policy) already ensures that it is taken to the policy endpoint. In such cases, the SID list can be optimized by excluding the endpoint Node SID when installing the policy. This draft specifies procedures to indicate whether the endpoint's node SID needs to be included or excluded when installing the SRv6 Policy. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Thanks! Bruno (for the Chairs) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
