Hi WG,I have read the draft，I support the adoption of this draft. Best RegardsRuanZheng
From: David Wright Date: 2025-11-04 21:42 To: SPRING WG List; [email protected] Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01 【本邮件为外部邮件，请注意核实发件人身份，并谨慎处理邮件内容中的链接及附件】 Hi WG, I support WG Adoption of this draft. Thanks, David From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 9:32 PM To: SPRING WG List <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01 Dear WG: This message starts a three-week adoption call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization, ending on November/19. From the Abstract: Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any path. SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions) that represent a source-routed policy. The packets steered into an SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR Policy. An SR Policy can be instantiated SR-MPLS and SRv6 data planes. In some use cases, an SRv6 Policy's SID list ends with the policy endpoint's node SID, and the traffic steered (over policy) already ensures that it is taken to the policy endpoint. In such cases, the SID list can be optimized by excluding the endpoint Node SID when installing the policy. This draft specifies procedures to indicate whether the endpoint's node SID needs to be included or excluded when installing the SRv6 Policy. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Thanks! Bruno (for the Chairs) _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
