Thanks. I missed this before my last version. I have integrated it into the next, I suspect this will satisfy what Joel was looking for as well. I will wait for any more comments and suggestions before pushing a new version.
nb On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 5:30 PM Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi authors, > I had an idea for a text change in section 7.1.1. that would obviate the > need to debate a requirement level for the filtering in this document as > discussed in the spring meeting today. I believe the need to filter is > derived from RFC8402 and not independently created by this document. Hence > I suggest the following change > > OLD: > Following the spirit of [RFC8402], the current document assumes that SRv6 > is deployed within a trusted domain. Traffic MUST be filtered at the domain > boundaries. > > NEW: > Following the direction of [RFC8402], the current document assumes that > SRv6 is deployed within a trusted domain and that the traffic is filtered > at the domain boundaries. > > Thanks > Suresh > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
