Hi Ran,


We appreciate the authors39 choice of simple, quantifiable parameters 
(counts/weights), which are highly efficient to implement .This makes the work 
very practical. We believe the draft is ready for adoption and implementation.





Bests,



Shengnan





————————————————————————————
From:"chen.ran" <[email protected]>
To:spring <[email protected]>
Cc: spring-chairs <[email protected]>
Sent:2025-11-25 17:04:42
Subject:[spring] Request for Discussion: Validity of SR Policy Candidate Path


Hi WG,

We would like to initiate a discussion on the 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity/ .

This draft builds upon RFC 9256 and it adds further considerations to the 
existing validation mechanisms in RFC 9256, with a focus on improving the 
current approach to CP validity checks.It defines new quantitative criteria 
(e.g., minimum valid SL count and weight) to refine the CP validity 
determination specified in RFC 9256, addressing limitations inherent in the 
simple "at least one active SID-List" criterion.

This work is critical for improving the reliability and operational accuracy of 
SR Policy deployments.

We request feedback on the mailing list to help us advance this draft. Thank 
you!




BR,

Ran

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to