Dear Alvaro,WG




 
I support adoption for this draft. It introduces the eligibility concept at the 
SR Policy Candidate Path level. It enhances SR Policy's path stability and 
operational controllability by providing the eligibility knob that controls the 
path's active state when the path deviates from its intention or when 
constraints are no longer met. 
 

BR,

Ran



 

From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>
 Date: Thursday, December 4, 2025 at 11:47 AM
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
 Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
 Subject: [spring] Re: Call for adoption: 
draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04 (Ends 2025-12-16)


 

Resending, given that last week was a holiday in the US, and some may have 
missed this message.


 
 
On November 25, 2025 at 5:13:54 PM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker 
([email protected]) wrote:



 Subject: Call for adoption: draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility-04 
 (Ends 2025-12-16) 
 
 This message starts a 3-week Call for Adoption for this document. 
 
 Abstract: 
 Segment Routing (SR) introduces new challenges for pinning candidate 
 paths on their intended paths (the path the PCE computed based on 
 provided intent and may have made bandwidth reservations on). The 
 actual path through a network can change or no longer meet the 
 required constraints if a SID list of an SR Policy candidate path is 
 not fully expressed as a list of adjacency SIDs or when a change in 
 the topology does happen. The introduction of the new candidate path 
 eligibility concept permits a path to be signaled and established as 
 operationally up, but controls whether the path is eligible to carry 
 traffic, thus influencing its active state. 
 The eligibility concept allows a system (operator, pce, headend, 
 etc.) to set eligibility as false when path deviations may have 
 occurred, or path constraints are no longer met for one or more SID 
 lists of a candidate path and clear it when candidate path deviations 
 are removed or constraints are met again. 
 
 File can be retrieved from: 
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility/ 
 
 Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by indicating 
 whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document. 
 Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated. 
 
 Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual 
 Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. 
 Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions 
 of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. 
 Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be 
 found at [3]. 
 
 Thank you. 
 [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ 
 [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ 
 [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to