Document: draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy Title: Circuit Style Segment Routing Policy Reviewer: Jacqueline McCall Review result: Has Issues
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is: “Ready with issues.” Issues Identified: 1. OAM and Security Considerations - Section 9 mentions S-BFD (Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) as an option for continuity checks. However, the Security Considerations section does not reference RFC 7880, which defines S-BFD. Please consider adding this as a security considerations reference for completeness. 2. Reference Updates - In the PCEP Security Considerations section, the draft references I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp. This document is now published as RFC 9862. Please update the reference accordingly. - In the BGP section, the draft references I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy. This is now RFC 9857. Please also update this reference accordingly. Suggested Editorial Improvements: - Ensure consistency in terminology (e.g., “candidate path” vs “Candidate Path” and "circuit-style" vs Circuit-Style" vs "Circuit Style"). - Verify that all references in Section 14 are up-to-date and correctly formatted after RFC promotions. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
