Hi WG,

 

After reviewing the latest version, I consider this a useful methodology for 
selecting an eligible candidate path, depending on the specific service 
requirements.

 

Path reliability and congestion adjustment are common challenges in service 
deployment.

Path reliability can be achieved through BFD detection of specific segment 
lists in SR Policy.

Currently, there is a lack of automatic switchover mechanisms for SR Policy 
paths during congestion, and this document effectively addresses this issue.

Section 4.2 clearly defines the forwarding quality model for SR Policy, and it 
is recommended to further supplement the YANG definitions in subsequent work.

 




Thanks,

wisdom




                        
                                                                        腾讯      
                                                                                
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
                    wisdomtan                                                   
                                                                                
                   
                                
                                                                                
                            [email protected]                            
                            
    






                    Yisong Liu<[email protected]&gt;&nbsp;在 2025年11月19日 
周三 9:27 写道:


Dear Chairs and WG,




Thank you for the valuable feedback following our presentation at IETF 124. We 
would like to offer some clarification to ensure our draft's purpose is 
properly understood.

In our latest revision, we have referenced 
draft-karboubi-spring-sr-policy-eligibility, though we wish to emphasize that 
the two drafts serve distinctly different purposes. The eligibility draft 
introduces new concepts for path qualification, while our draft focuses 
specifically on defining a mechanism for path selection and switching based on 
forwarding performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and bandwidth. Our 
approach predefines quality requirements for SR policies and enables rapid path 
selection or switching when real-time monitoring indicates these requirements 
are no longer met. The reference to eligibility is included to maintain 
compatibility with the SR Policy architecture defined in RFC 9256.

We believe there is no&nbsp; significant overlap between our draft and 
eligibility draft and see value in advancing them independently. We would 
appreciate if the chairs can give the guidance on how to proceed with our 
draft. Additionally, we have formally requested an adoption call during our 
presentation and would be grateful if the chairs can help to schedule this.

Welcome all comments and suggestions regarding our draft and look forward to 
continued feedback from the working group.




Best regards,
Yisong on behalf of co-authors




&nbsp;
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to