Hi SPRING WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
It proposes a comprehensive and practical architecture that enables the
management of an SRv6 network for operation, and also specifies some
requirements for an SRv6 SFC implementation.
Best regards,
--
Ryosuke Takenaka
On 2026/01/15 15:19, Wataru Mishima wrote:
Dear SPRING WG,
I would like to request WG adoption of the following Internet-Draft:
* Title: SRv6 SFC Architecture with SR-aware Functions
* URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-watal-spring-srv6-sfc-sr-aware-functions/
This document describes an SRv6 SFC architecture with SR-aware
functions, based on existing SRv6 mechanisms. No new protocol
extensions are defined.
The draft has been presented and discussed in previous SPRING WG
sessions, including at IETF 124:
*
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/124/materials/slides-124-spring-srv6-sfc-architecture-with-sr-aware-functions-00.pdf
The architecture has also been validated through implementations
demonstrated at recent IETF Hackathons, including:
* Flow-based SR Policy classification using BGP Flowspec in GoBGP
* SRv6 Policy and loose source routing support for SFC in Pola PCE
* BGP-LS Service Segment extensions implemented in GoBGP and ExaBGP
* A manager implemented using OpenStack and Ansible
The corresponding Hackathon material is available at:
* IETF 124 Hackathon:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/124/materials/slides-124-hackathon-sessd-srv6-sfc-architecture-with-sr-aware-functions-00.pdf
We would appreciate the WG's feedback and consideration for adoption.
Best regards,
--
Wataru Mishima
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
