On March 2, 2026 at 6:18:21 AM, Andrew Alston wrote:

Andrew:

Hi!

Thanks for the review!

I'm replying just to the status question.

...
> Secondly - from my perspective I believe a document such as this should
> probably be a BCP - but this may come later. My question is why this
document
> is purely informational rather than a BCP?

BCP was the intended status until recently.  The Shepherd proposed a
change, and there were no objections on the mailing list.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/mcJKKEuhVAxOvxUqhx_ZnNV28Uk/

Take care!

Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to