Hi Joel,
Thanks for putting this out for discussion.
From my understanding, it's more like bullet 1), an MNA Substack may never be
considered a segment in the sense of RFC9256 section 4. An segment of the
segment list is either an MPLS label/SRv6 SID or the context that can be
resolved to an MPLS label/SRv6 SID. At least an MNA Substack is not one of the
existing segment types.
Regards,
Yao
Original
From: JoelHalpern <[email protected]>
To: SPRING WG List <[email protected]>;
Date: 2026年03月07日 01:26
Subject: [spring] Question for the working group
In regard to Segment Routing Policy as defined by RFC 9256 and the MPLS
Network Action (MNA) work that is being standardized by the MPLS working
group, please express an opinion as to whether:
1) An MNA Substack may never be considered a segment in the sense of RFC
9256 section 4;
2) Some MNA substacks may be considered segments in the sense of RFC
9256 Section 4 (possibly with a new segment type, possibly with an
existing segment type)
3) MNA substacks are segments in the sense of RFC 9256 section 4
(possibly with a new segment type, possibly with an existing segment type)
Yours,
Joel (with Alvaro and Bruno)
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
