Dear Alvaro, Many thanks for the detailed review. We will come back soon with suggested changes/improvements. The new version will be uploaded, when upload is re-opened before the meeting. Thanks Bala'zs
-----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2026 11:52 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Luis M. Contreras <[email protected]> Subject: Chair Review of draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection-07 (WGLC) Dear authors: I have many questions and concerns, and I believe significant work is required. To be clear, I'm not opposed to this work progressing, but the draft is not ready in its current form. Please see detailed comments inline below. I want to highlight some high-level issues: 1. Is Path Protection required? (line 105) 2. Operational/Deployment guidance is present in several parts of the draft _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
