I concur. This will be verified unless someone from the author team or the WG jumps in to explain otherwise.
Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 12:51 AM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > I looked at the text, and I believe this report should be marked as > Verified. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On October 7, 2026 at 2:35:47 PM, [email protected] ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC10038, > "Distributing the Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Locator Using DHCPv6" > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9210/ > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Paul Aitken <[email protected]> > > Section 4.2 says: > > Original Text > ------------- > IALocator-Options: Options associated with this SRv6 Locator. A > variable-length field (determined by subtracting the length of > SRv6-Locator from Option-Len minus 12). The status code > NoSRv6LocatorAvail indicates the server has no locators available > to assign to the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR(s). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > IALocator-Options: Options associated with this SRv6 Locator. A > variable-length field (determined by subtracting the length of > SRv6-Locator from Option-Len minus 16). The status code > NoSRv6LocatorAvail indicates the server has no locators available > to assign to the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR(s). > > Notes > ----- > Correct "12" to "16". > > Section 4.2 defines: "Option-Len: 16 + the length of SRv6-Locator + the > length of the IALocator-Options field in octets." > > Therefore the length of IALocator-Options is Option-Len − 16 − > length(SRv6-Locator) , i.e. "Option-Len minus 16," not "Option-Len minus > 12." > > The erroneous "12" may have been carried over from the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR > option in Section 4.1, whose fixed portion (IAID + T1 + T2 = 12 octets) is > correctly "Option-Len minus 12." > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC10038 (draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Distributing the Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Locator Using > DHCPv6 > Publication Date : August 2026 > Author(s) : W. Cheng, Ed., R. Han, C. Lin, Ed., D. Voyer, G. Zhang > Category : Proposed Standard > Source : spring (rtg) > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
