Dear chairs and the WG, During IETF126 Spring & 6man sessions, authors of draft-ali-6man-srv6-vpn-icmp-error-handling<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ali-6man-srv6-vpn-icmp-error-handling/> and draft-varhal-6man-icmp-srv6-vpn<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-varhal-6man-icmp-srv6-vpn/> presented plan to merge the drafts. The authors have followed up by publishing draft-alivar-6man-icmp-error-srv6-vpn<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alivar-6man-icmp-error-srv6-vpn/> (merged draft). Any feedback from the WG is greatly appreciated.
During the IETF126 sessions, the authors also asked chairs of Spring and 6man WGs to advise home for the draft. Given the draft does not introduce any changes to ICMP protocol, the author feel Spring may be a better fit. However, we will follow-up based on the WG chairs advise. Can the Spring & 6man chair discuss and advise which WG the work should progress (with cross-WG reviews). Thanks Regards … Zafar (on behalf of the co-authors)
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
