Further to what Roland says, any difference between H-W and D-W friction loss calculations are completely overshadowed by the error introduced by arbitrarily assigned C-factor/roughness coefficient. As I have said many times, don't waste time measuring with a micrometer when you're cutting with a chain saw!

Joe

Roland Huggins wrote:

Although the following statement was previously made and repetition becomes truth (like the need for roof vents in sprinklered buildings) allow me to say, lets not repeat it anymore. It just isn't true.

Actually a head to head comparison between Hazen -Williams and Darcy- Weisbach, HW will under estimates by a small amount that gets larger as the velocity goes up. Now this is for black steel (it reverses for copper). For instance a 1 in. sch 40 at 32 ft/s (86 gpm): HW - 1.46 psi/ft and DW - 1.83 psi/ft representing a 20% difference. At 10ft/s there is an 11% difference. As the pipe size increases, the amount of difference shrinks with 2 in. showing a 15% difference. This is not linear since 4 in. pipe shows a slightly larger difference than a 3 in. one.

If we really want to discuss reality (verses the applied method since sprinkler discharge does NOT reflect a science based reality), the use of total pressure verses velocity pressure presents a very conservative factor. Most get hung up on the second sprinkler discharging slightly less (and miss that the second ranch line also discharges less) but the overall system demand is greater using total pressure.

Now if someone would show me a sprinkler that discharges all its water in a 10 X 13 rectangle and the density is uniform, THEN I MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN SPLITTING HAIRS

Roland

On Jan 16, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Paul Sincaglia wrote:

However, as the forum has
been kicking about for days now...Hazen-Williams overestimates  friction
losses at higher pipe velocities.  For our normal demand calculations


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to