Paul,

As far as I know the only manufacturer of cpvc pellets (the "raw"
material) is Noveon and that they will only sell their product to
manufacturers that adhere their (Noveon's) manufacturing standards so
essentially all cpvc is the same. There used to be a compatibility
issue with a different base material manufactured by GEM before Tyco
acquired Grinnell but the GEM product has not been available for
years. I'm ccing a copy of this to Mark Hoyt (Noveon rep hereabouts)
and a trusted friend, Mark, can you confirm my comments or give Paul
the true skinny.

On 4/12/07, Paul Sincaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks-

Just a general question regarding CPVC.

As a specifier, I normally make no distinctions regarding the
manufacturer or brand name for piping or fittings.  I simply state the
material and relevant/applicable ASTM standards etc.  After all, I want
my clients to get the best pricing and open specs tend to do that.
Obviously I make exceptions to that if I have a good reason (hydraulic
performance, specific feature needed/wanted, similarity with an owners
other systems etc.)

Which brings me to my question...Is there any need to be more specific
about CPVC products?  I have always held the belief that CPVC is CPVC.
Provided that supplier of pipe and/or fittings maintains a UL listing
(or other listing) for their products for fire protection use, then the
parts are essentially interchangeable.  Am I wrong?

I know that Blazemaster in their literature will generally steer you
toward product mfg/suppliers that use their resin and assume the others
do the same.  But I have always seen this as being the equivalent of GM
wanting me to use Genuine GM parts.

Does anyone have any hard factual data to the contrary such as technical
bulletins etc.

Thanks

Paul Sincaglia





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Brown
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CPVC & Seismic Bracing

Maybe this will help

 To register click on this link https://www.krm.com/clse

Topic: New Seismic Requirements with NFPA and IBC The topic of seismic
design has become well known to many over the past five years.  And like
many, your learning experience has most likely come with a cost.  The
new editions of NFPA and IBC have arrived and offer a much more
understandable process for those of us involved with fire protection
systems to apply.  This seminar has been organized with condensed
step-by-step information that leads from the "when" through to the
"how".  Whether you have wrestled with this before or you have not yet
experienced this process, this seminar will be valuable to both
engineers of record, sprinkler system designers and authorities of
jurisdiction.  You do not want to miss this.


Thank you,

Chris Brown
Fire Protection Designer, Poole Fire Protection
Office: 913.829.8650   Direct: 913.747.2056   Cell: 913.208.3600   Fax:
913.829.8690


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CPVC & Seismic Bracing

Roland,

That's exactly what I thought and tried to explain to the South Carolina
State Fire Marshall's office. They insist the piping has to be 2 1/2" or
larger.

Matt



|---------+---------------------------------------->
|         |            Roland Huggins              |
|         |            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
|         |            Sent by:                    |
|         |            [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |            prinkler.org                |
|         |            04/04/2007 12:32 PM         |
|         |            Please respond to           |
|         |            sprinklerforum              |
|---------+---------------------------------------->

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------|
  |
|
  |
|
  |
To|
  |        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |
cc|
  |
|
  |
Subject|
  |        Re: CPVC & Seismic Bracing
|
  |
|
  |
|
  |
|
  |
|
  |
|
  |
|

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------|




the pipe size on the branch line is when a sway brace is REQUIRED for
the branch line.  That criteria does NOT eliminate the requirement to
sway brace the main by use of an offset brace thus size is immaterial
(except for the brace being listed for the size of interest).  If the
brace wasn't listed for 1 inch (which it is), then as the designer,
you'd need to size the starter piece to meet the needs of the brace.

Roland

On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I know this was discussed recently but I don't think this specific
> point was brought up. Currently there is only one listed sway brace
> for CPVC and it is a lateral brace. Now in order to provide
> longitudinal bracing it was suggested to install a lateral brace on
> the branch line within 24 in. of the main. However if you read
> 9.3.5.3.5 it states "...for lines that are 2 1/2" and greater in
> diameter". So what do you do for a 13R system with lets say 1 1/2"
> mains and 1" branch lines?
>
> Matt Drewello
>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)




------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential
and/or privileged material.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this
message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer.  Any views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender and may not
necessarily reflect the views of the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



--
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to