I'm nowhere close to being a PE, but I can't help myself. I'd kindly replay "Gladly and ASAP, as soon as you approve the change order."
Ed Kramer Littleton, CO > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sprinklerforum- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Fletcher, Ron > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: PE Peer Review > > I would like the take from the PE's on forum on how to deal with a plan > review comment from an unnamed engineering firm (RJA). > > "Due to the higher than normal potential for a fire in the occupant > sleeping and common areas, the reduction in fire are (remote area) for > quick response sprinkler in accordance with NFPA #13 Figure 11.2.3.2.3.1 > is not a good engineering practice. Please revise the hydraulic > calculation to account for at least the minimum 1500 square foot design > area as specified by NFPA #13." > > The hazard is a dormitory at a minimum security prison. > > Ron Fletcher > Aero Automatic Sprinkler > Phoenix, AZ _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
