I think you are correct. It probably needs to be revised. They might also appreciate the design change including a system that will last a little longer.
Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP Sales Engineer Alliance Fire Protection *Licensed in KS & MO 913.888.0647 ph 913.888.0618 f 913.927.0222 cell www. AFPsprink.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Johnston Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: System Replacement Good Friday Morning All: Yesterday I visited a facility that has an existing gridded dry system installed in 1981 - I assume that was legit back in those days? The system is protecting fruit stored in bins in a controlled atmosphere building. The system is rotting out and needs to be replaced, I can't find a specific clause in the codes that say's replace it as it currently is - the problem being a dry grid. To further complicate the problem the original classification was a Class II (fruit in wood bins), today those bins are HDPE - Group A Plastic. With this information would you agree that you can't replace the system as originally installed? Jim Johnston, P.E. Fire Protection Engineer Inland Fire Protection, Inc 1100 Ahtanum Road Yakima, WA 98903 Phone 509-248-4471 Fax 509-248-1180 [email protected] _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
