The samples have yet to make it to a testing lab as of yet.  THe customer 
wanted a little more investigation to see if it was through out the system 
first.  We found areas with 6 inch pipe that had the hardened substance 
(assumably MIC) three inches thick inside the pipe.  We measured some areas 
where the internal diameter of 6 inch was reduced to 2.5 inches at the remote 
cross main of a  wet grid system. Since it is in a huge factory we are now 
moving forward with sample testing and investigating the other 38 buildings.  
Some early reports from the other buildings are saying main drain numbers have 
decreased by half over the last 12 years.  Will provide the sample results when 
we recieve them.  We are really greatful for well educated fitters / inspectors 
catching this.  We have been trying to convince the powers that be that there 
is a mic issue in this area.

Happy fourth to you all!!!
 
J. Blocker
EFPS
(303) 353-9712




________________________________
From: Andy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 10:10:21 AM
Subject: RE: MIC

Jay,
Back in march you were fighting a MIC problem and was going to research some
different labs.
Would you care to share your results?
You can contact me off line if you prefer.

Thank you for your attention.
Andy Johnston
Your are welcome to call my Cell (386)547-4970



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Jay
Blocker
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 10:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MIC

Thanks for the help on this, I am going to be requesting sample reports from
atleast four companies now.  I was still wondering if anyone had ever seen
this particular pipe arrangement with regard to the main in the hall
and sprigs in the cool area?  Because of cramming the main into the 18
inches of available space above grid and below fire barrier there was
not enough room to slope the piping is what the installing contractor
says.  Would that not then mean it could not meet the requiremnts of
8.15.2.3.1 that this particular arrangement of piping would not have been
advised?
 
J. Blocker
EFPS
(303) 353-9712







_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)



      
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to