Yeah besides that .98/.97 really only works in the theory world. When the fitter drops the nozzle installing it, do you think he'll ever admit it's egg shaped with that big gouge in it cause he dropped it. Especially if no one notices. What's it's CD now? .821365798213465?????
Seriously, how many of us were staying up at night this weekend, worrying about the .97 vrs .98? Your nozzle must be fundamentally different :) --And if you just have Q, convert to ft^3/sec, convert 1.75" diam to ft^2, divide 1st by 2nd to get ft/sec, h=v^2/2g, P= h x .433. (coefficient of discharge for monitor noz might be about .98, g=32.2 ft/sec^2)-- This means the coefficient of discharge is .97 And if you just have Q, convert to ft^3/sec, convert 1.75" diam to ft^2, divide 1st by 2nd to get ft/sec, h=v^2/2g, P= h x .433. (coefficient of discharge for monitor noz might be about .98, g=32.2 ft/sec^2) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
