Our experience with PA American Water is similar to Steve's; they do maintain 
hydrant flow data and share for locales where they do have historical data, 
they are consistent in the application of their policies, and they fully meter 
all combined services with no requirement for separate fire main taps. Can the 
local fire marshals help you overcome the dilemma by noting the reduction in 
reliability when unnecessary pumps are required?

We are adding a booster pump due to a degradation model by a local city's water 
bureau, however, in an area where it shouldn't be allowed. This city has 
adopted a local amendment that requires use of the degraded supply. However, 
absent a local amendment to the state Uniform Construction Code the surrounding 
townships that get water from this city water bureau are not bound to comply 
with the degradation model, and in fact are prohibited from enforcing it since 
application of the degradation model would be introducing a requirement without 
a law to require it. The local township BCO agrees. However, our customer's 
lawyer said he'd spend $100k to maybe beat the water bureau in court, lose a 
year of schedule, to save a $30,000 pump.  THAT is along the lines of political 
clout strong-arming customers into submission that Alan described. 

George L.  Church, Jr., CET  
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Is there an 8000 lb gorilla in your area influencing fire 
sprinkler systems?

Allan:
 
Your question, and Joel's reply are not consistent with my experience here in 
San Diego County with American Water's local service company, which was 
formerly known as Cal-American Water.   Here, they serve the City of Coronado, 
and portions of Imperial Beach and an annexed area of San Diego, as well as 
three Navy bases (more or less).   They are not the biggest player in the 
market in California by a long margin, and here in SD they're visible, but not 
a gorilla.   And they have been very, VERY easy to work with, including 
provision of flow data, based on models that determine the residual pressure at 
the back of curb, where they leave off after installation of a new fire service 
lateral.    Have never had to deal with the issues you describe regarding pumps 
and so forth.  If I had to pick one district to hold up as a customer service 
model, based on my experiences only, I would probably consider them along with 
a couple others, ironically.
 
SL

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of AKS-Gmail-IMAP
Sent: Sun 10/30/2011 3:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Is there an 8000 lb gorilla in your area influencing fire sprinkler 
systems?



The subject of this question is American Water based in NJ that sells 90% or 
more of the water in the USA and Canada through its subsidiary local water 
companies that it has been buying up for some time. A water company here is one 
of these. Except for a couple of systems, it controls practically all the water 
in the St. Louis metropolitan area on the Missouri side of the Mississippi 
river. Another such company controls the water on the Illinois side of the 
Mississippi river.  It is common knowledge the water company managers will not 
provide historical hydrant test information even though the company is present 
at every hydrant test made on their system. Fire sprinkler systems around here 
are usually designed based upon recent hydrant tests with some debating over 
the required safety factor applied to the available water energy. The local 
Fire Marshall reviews and approves the final design and water supply basis.  
The local water supply networks vary from place to place in supply quality and 
their hydrant test results are predictable.

Such is how it has been. Recently the water company has added the fire 
sprinkler system to its water tap application documents. They now hold a 
project's water tap in ransom if the sprinkler system design extracts more 
water energy than some value that they determine based on the tap's location.  
A 20% safety margin has been mentioned in this forum as excessive.  That is 
nothing compared to a 35% to 40% margin ransom value. The water company refuses 
to make the tap unless the fire sprinkler system design is changed to require 
no more energy than a value they dictate, regardless of the AHJ's prior 
approval and historical system knowledge. Is that starting to happen in your 
area? 
If so, is the tap ransom a function of the project's construction cost?

One might say the water company is looking out for our safety. I suspect they 
are intentionally trying to decrease the liability of extracting more profit 
from their customers that results from not properly applying water sales fees 
into maintaining water supply systems. There have been a few reports of 
dramatic water supply failures during fires. These have been on American Water 
owned systems. If a fire pump goes into a project as a result of the water 
company mandate, then the water company's expected failure responsibility cost 
is reduced by the added probability of fire pump failure and electrical system 
supple failure and so on. Maybe this kind of profit optimization adds up to big 
money when you supply 90% of the water and you control every tap. Maybe it 
means even more if you also had a stake in the pump business. I don't know if 
they do, but if you supply water it might help to make your own pumps.

Allan Seidel
St. Louis, MO



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111030/8e4c8285/attachment.bin>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to