Is there a difference between abandoned and modified? What if the
13-23 tied Density to ceiling height and Area to occupancy? Even
without a fire, a .1 at the deflector is a .09 on the floor due to
some droplets evaporating by friction. The higher the ceiling, the
higher the amount of vaporization, therefore a lower Actual Delivered
Density of water in the liquid state on the fuel. Tieing Area to
occupancy gives it a kind of Quantity of Combustibles feel.
How much do I owe you Roland?
Quoting bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com:
I'll take it, based on the feeling that ten years from now 'green'
will have become 'greener still'.
Quoting Roland Huggins <rhugg...@firesprinkler.org>:
On May 25, 2012, at 3:49 AM, Damien Shannon wrote:
Any bets on whether any time in
the next decade or two that NFPA 13 will abandon the approach using
the density/area curves?
Roland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120525/0005718b/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
