I cant think of any reasons why the 13-96 reqmnt for QR in LH wouldn't apply or be a problem.
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2012, at 12:14 PM, "Morey, Mike" <mo...@bmwc.com> wrote: > Educational is classified as LH, if you're replacing all the heads they > should definitely be QR, the explanitory material (at least in the 2010 > handbook) suggests even if you "overdesign" the denisty above LH, if the > standard would catagorize it as LH the heads should still be QR. > > Mike Morey, SET, CFPS > Sprinkler Designer > BMW Constructors, Inc. > O: 317.651.0596 | C: 317.586.8111 > www.bmwc.com > > ________________________________ > > From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org on behalf of Todd - FPDC > Sent: Mon 7/2/2012 11:14 AM > To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org > Subject: Head replacement on pipe sched > > > > I am recommending replacing all of the sprinklers on a pipe schedule system > in a school. SR or QR heads? > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: winmail.dat > Type: application/ms-tnef > Size: 3923 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: > <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120702/d471fc4f/attachment.bin> > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
