Twice!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 12:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Stage/platform -- consensus methods

Whoa, I BD'd the Forum.

Steve

Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote:



Steve

"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

Pure poetry! How's the land down under?

----- Original Message -----
From: å... .... [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 01:14 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Stage/platform -- consensus methods

As good judgment is the more valuable (and arguably more difficult) service 
provided by the professional relative to their enforcement of statutory 
prescriptions, it can be argued that the life safety professional should render 
their good judgment.

Fire protection and construction almost always operates in an open system, it 
is logically impossible to capture all the boundary conditions, much less 
attempt to categorize them in words and prescriptions (arm waving included).
Prescriptive (i.e. deemed-to-satisfy)  solutions invaluably satisfy 90+ % of 
fire design conditions, so good judgment on the tough decisions is not required 
on a regular basis, but good judgment is needed often enough that is should be 
a serious condition for consideration when hiring a professional.



Oft heard quote from U.S. Court of Appeals,  "I  know what's legal, not what's 
right. And I'll stick to what's legal."


This forum is a good place at determining what is legal.
This forum is not the best place at determining what is right, in part because 
people are afraid to exercise public judgment and risk impugning their 
reputation and/or financial situation.


Now the question as to 'what is good judgment?' is another discussion.  There 
are documented methods proven effective at getting from "what is legal" to what 
is right using forum's opinions such as this one.



scot deal
excelsior fire
gsm 61 4 35 292 599



> Isn't Working with the Codes Fun.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachme
nts/20120730/3b354516/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to