If it's truly a 13d system it is a min of .05 density throughout - there are no light or ordinary hazard areas. Is it possible that this 'house' is being used for something other than single family living such as a nursery home, school, or something else requiring additional sprinkler protection? Just because something looks like a house doesn't mean it's going to be used as one. Otherwise sounds like it could just be a confused architect.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Brian Harris <[email protected]>wrote: > I admit I don't do many residential systems so this questions might seem > strange but I have a 13D system and there are notes on the FP drawings that > are calling some areas Light Hazard & some Ordinary Hazard & then list the > densities accordingly. Here's where the confusion comes in, if it's a 13D > system would I design the whole thing to 0.05/sq.ft ? The residential heads > spec'd out are all figured that way as well. Have I totally lost my mind? > > Brian Harris, CET > BVS Systems Inc. > Sprinkler Division > bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/> > Phone: 704.896.9989 > Fax: 704.896.1935 > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120919/e26771ac/attachment.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120919/2d2d2c82/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
