George, you've done it again... made it all clear for all of us! Hear, hear!

David Toshio Williams, FPE, LEED-AP O+M

LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN



-----Original Message-----
From: George Church [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Project Specifications

If we were writing Code, someone would have yelled out "Undefinable" and we 
wouldn't have put it in the document.

If the firm issuing this is competent, I don't see a problem. They're just as 
frustrated trying to educate some unwashed contractors as we are in trying to 
educate some plumbing PEs with fatal errors in their docs. If they're not a 
competent FPE house, then RLH. 


George L.  Church, Jr., CET
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Project Specifications

Or perhaps less than normal assistance can be billed extra. I asked for a small 
soda at the Burger King. I was informed that they didn't have have small, only 
large and "regular." I asked what size "regular was and was told it's like a 
medium. So I said, "Then that would be between a large and a small size?" She 
replied yes. I said well then I want the small one regular is bigger than. She 
said regular was the smallest they had.

I don't know of any manuals instructing contractors to bury the job ib RFIs, 
and so I'll accept that they exist on David's word, but what's excessive? We 
have a Sesame Street predicament here.

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Bruce Verhei <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another way to view this is that words should not be interpreted to 
> have a ridiculous meaning. That "excessive" assistance will be back 
> charged makes clear that normal amount of assistance will not be back charged.
>
> Bv
>
> Sent from my Motorola ATRIXT 4G on AT&T
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: "Failla, Daniel" <[email protected]>
> To: "'[email protected]'" 
> <[email protected]
> >
> Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 14:36:58 GMT+00:00
> Subject: RE: Project Specifications
>
> So are Architects/General Contractor going to start back charging for 
> RFI's?  I have had projects with 8 RFI's because of issues with the 
> bid documents and the classic statement on the drawing, "Contractor 
> shall not deviate without written approval."
>
> Dan Failla
> Our Town Fire Sprinkler Designs
> Charleston, SC FMO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Project Specifications
>
> Found something new in a FP spec that I think is worth sharing. Spec's 
> are copyrighted by a nationally known FP consultant.
>
> "Excessive assistance provided by the Architect/General Contractor to 
> the Contractor, at the Contractor's request, shall be at cost to the 
> Contractor, via back charge, ..." And it goes on to say that just 
> because they charged for the assistance it doesn't "imply direction or 
> approval".
>
> It's odd that there is no "Excessive Interference" clause.
>
> Ron Fletcher
> Aero - Phoenix
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attac
> hments/20121106/0ba4ae81/attachment.html
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, 
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20121106/6ec0ff8d/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to