I can see a case for libel, too. Even if not pursued, watch the look on the 
supervisors face when mentioned. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 14, 2012, at 8:40 AM, "craig.pr...@ch2m.com" <craig.pr...@ch2m.com> 
wrote:

> Referred to Law enforcement, really?  Because someone said something bad 
> about someone?
> 
> Craig L. Prahl, CET   
> Fire Protection 
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> craig.pr...@ch2m.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of John Drucker
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 7:06 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: advice
> 
> Colleagues.  That sort of behavior is unacceptable and should be referred to 
> law enforcement. There are plenty of good ahj's out there that remain 
> objective and impartial . When we don't know something we ask for 
> clarification from the applicant. Most respond with additional documentation 
> to support compliance resulting in permits being issued. That's why its 
> imperative that plan review and inspection only be performed by qualified 
> impartial and independent persons. Last but not least, a suggestion to the 
> industry ;-) would be to standardize documentation so that PR's and 
> Inspectors don't have to hunt around for stuff. We have applicants who's 
> documentation includes actual code cites and details for  significant items 
> such as coverage, obstructions, fire rated construction, hangers, bracing, 
> bfp etc. It makes the review that much easier because it demonstrates to the 
> reviewer that code requirements were consulted. Food for thought.        
> John Drucker - Mobile Email
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
> <sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org>
> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org <sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org>
> Sent: Fri Dec 14 06:25:46 2012
> Subject: RE: advice
> 
> I, too had an experience like this I shared here some years ago.
> Turned out the FD plan reviewer had a competitor friend look at the plans for 
> him and he bled all over them with little or no reason for his comments.
> All out of spite for losing the work.  When I took them to the State Fire 
> Marshall's Office and asked for a second review they must have spoken to him 
> because he called and said he needed a 'revised' set for review.  I made one 
> change from all the original comments (moved the dry sidewalls from the side 
> wall of the garage to the rear side to 'avoid' an open garage door) and 
> mailed them to him.  Long story short, he had no knowledge of design or 
> hydraulics but what his buddy told him and held up a subdivision for 2 
> months.  I passed on the remaining buildings.
> TD
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:35 AM
> To: b...@firebyknight.com; sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: advice
> 
> Probably already been done.
> 
> 
> At 12:09 PM 12/13/2012, you wrote:
>> #@*&  !#@%  ^&%$*  !@#$@#$
>> 
>> Might be a good start?  LOL.
>> 
>> Bob Knight, CET III
>> 208-318-3057
>> www.firebyknight.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
>> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
>> ParsleyConsulting
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:57 AM
>> To: SprinklerFORUM
>> Subject: advice
>> 
>> I have to admit I'm completely at a loss for how to respond to a 
>> written review comment a friend of mine received yesterday.  It read as
> follows:
>> 
>> "The person that ran the hydraulic calculations has obviously not been 
>> trained to use the program and is not knowledgeable in sprinkler system 
>> design."
>> 
>> As you might well imagine he's quite upset.  Anyone have advice on how 
>> to proceed?
>> --
>> 
>> PARSLEY CONSULTING
>> 
>> Ken Wagoner, SET
>> 
>> 760.745.6181 voice
>> 
>> 760.745.0537 fax
>> 
>> parsleyconsult...@cox.net <mailto:parsleyconsult...@cox.net>e-mail
>> 
>> www.ParsleyConsulting.com <http://www.ParsleyConsulting.com>website
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> Todd G. Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860.535.2080
> www.fpdc.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY:
> This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and 
> confidential, nor is it, unless specifically stated, intended to be relied 
> upon by any person or persons other than the individual or entity named above 
> and no warranties or representations are made or intended to persons or 
> entities not named above.  If the reader is not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, return 
> this message to the address above and delete all copies.  Thank you.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20121214/bad5aafb/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to