My recollection of the 7 psi min ehp was to make sure the cap was removed and 
an acceptable pattern developed. 

Thought it took 5 psi to clear the waterway so 7 became the min, maybe for 
pattern, maybe buffer. 

Mark, that's a Min ehp. With today's hi perf heads we often need lots more, 
determined also as you illustrated. 

Glc

Sent from my iPhone

On May 21, 2013, at 9:42 AM, "Brad Casterline" <bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com> wrote:

> For example foam/water deluge .16/entire area, heads 9x9=81, times .16=12.96
> gpm/head, throwing 4'-6" each way. The requirement to balance the flows
> within 15% of each other is physical (we want a fairly uniform blanket on
> the floor), but the 7 psi min is not physical, unless 5.48 psi will not
> throw 4'-6". Thanks Mark. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mphe...@aerofire.com [mailto:mphe...@aerofire.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:31 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: calc procedure logic
> 
> Wouldn't it depend on the application rate, area of protection and orifice
> size?
> Mark at Aero
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brad Casterline [mailto:bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 01:03 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
> Subject: calc procedure logic
> 
> Would the 7 psi minimum operating pressure from NFPA 13 Calculation
> Procedure apply to open head deluge, since the operating parts have already
> been ejected clear of the frame and deflector by a ball-peen hammer?
> 
> 
> 
> Brad Casterline, NICET IV
> 
> Fire Protection Division
> 
> 
> 
> FSC, Inc.
> 
> P: 913-722-3473
> 
> bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com
> 
> www.fsc-inc.com
> 
> 
> 
> Engineering Solutions for the Built Environment
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to