Yes, NFPA 13 is a minimum
standard.  Th
is is
 clear to North American designers.
What may not be clear is that in other

areas
where resources
(either material or in personnel) are scarcer, NFPA 13 is  not a minimum
standard but a bar too high and one bridge too far.  Conforming with all of
NFPA 13 can be too costly (in terms of materials or capable personnel) for
many jurisdictions that are only starting to "*do" *fire suppression.

One solution is a *lighter *sprinkler design document.  NFPA 13
/NZS-4541/BS:EN 12845
/AS 2118 etc. could all be slimmed and trimmed to provide a leaner system
that while barely less reliable, certainly would be a life saving
proposition for fire protection.

There are those on these standards committees who will say "we can not
frame a lower standard of fire sprinkler care to people just because they
can not afford the full fare in design, install and maintenance."  These
standard framers would not be lowering the care to subscribers;  they would
be increasing the care to currently unprotected exposures.  Subscribing
jurisdictions should determine their own minimum standard.   It is their
right to adopt the minimum standard that fits their condition.  Should this
not be a definition within risk assessment:   risk acceptance is local and
necessarily dynamically so?  Simply declare publicly and as accurately as
possible--what the risk is that a Standard is putting out there.  Let
people make more informed choices as to what level of risk they accept.
 For many 3rd and 2nd world locations, a simpler, effective sprinkler
system provides the difference between maintaining bad jobs at factories
versus losing parents to tragedies.

Some NFPA 13 committee members are uniquely qualified to best cut corners
off their momentous document; cuts that would create the most reliable *
lighter* design alternative.  However, many of these members are
financially shackled from making what is obvious to me, a morally superior
judgment and activity.  As a result, many developing countries are left
without means to comply with, what is arguably called, just a minimum
standard.

Saying "its not my responsibility" is not the best dressed advert for the
field of fire safety.


Scot Deal
Excelsior Fire/Risk Engineering
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to