2000@65 might set a record for jockey pumps. And that is if the two jockey 
pumps that Tom referenced are present failed.

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com
860-535-2080 (ofc)

> On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:11 PM, ampeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> With working overseas I've seen some projects with 2 pumps. One big and one 
> small. I asked about this and I got a straight face answer.
> 
> "well if one sprinkler heads goes off we don't want the big fire pump turning 
> on. Only if there's a high demand. The smaller pump handles small fires and 
> the large pump handles large fires."
> 
> When I brought up that well why do you care? I got a shoulder shrug and look 
> of why would I not want 2 pumps? 
> 
> I summed it up that the smaller pump was used as a larger jockey pump. They 
> didn't want the main pump to come on unless it was absolutely necessary. I 
> think it might have been some kind of a reason or concern over to much 
> pressure on the system if the large fire pump turned on. But still it 
> wouldn't have exceed 175psi with the larger pump.
> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2014, at 2:33 AM, Charles Thurston <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Todd,
>> 
>> There might have been an office area in there at one time the smaller pump 
>> was for. No telling from here :) Good Luck and please let us know what you 
>> end up doing.
>> 
>> Friday, March 7, 2014, 2:23:27 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>>> I have no idea what the purpose of the smaller pump is. The
>>> 2500@125 pump would (in theory) produce 3750 gpm at 81 psi. The
>>> churn pressure for the 2000@65 pump is 78 psi. The smaller pump is
>>> not going to have any impact on the available water until the
>>> pressure falls below 78 psi, which would probably be somewhere
>>> around 4000 gpm (assuming the actual flow will exceed the 150%
>>> point). If all 3 pumps are flowing, that number goes up to 8000 gpm.
>>> At 8000 gpm, 500000 gallons will last 62.5 minutes. If you have a
>>> fire that is demanding 8000 gpm, it is probably time to get out the 
>>> marshmallows and call CNN.
>> 
>>> I know there were some funky things that went on with the old IRI
>>> Maximum Reliability Systems. Could this have possible been one of those?
>> 
>>> Todd G Williams, PE
>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>>> Stonington, CT
>>> www.fpdc.com
>>> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>>> From: Todd - Work <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: February 25, 2014 at 4:42:15 PM EST
>>>> To: Barbara Corbeil <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Video by uconnwbb
>>> Todd G Williams, PE
>>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>>> Stonington, CT
>>> www.fpdc.com
>>> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
>> 
>>>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 7:57 AM, "Tom Duross" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I emailed and received order info on the remaining original pump.  I 
>>>> emailed
>>>> the factory back and asked if three were ordered at once and what the sizes
>>>> were.
>>>> I have no idea what the demand is Todd, maybe I should refer you to take a
>>>> look on that end.  I do know it was a refrigerated warehouse when the order
>>>> was placed in 1971.
>>>> I just boggles me that, assuming they were all the same, one replacement 
>>>> was
>>>> ordered so small.  Two 2500@125 and one 2000@65.  Not even 2000@125,
>>>> 2000@65.
>>>> Scott, my thinking (and it's just me) would be to progress from small to
>>>> large like with jockeys when in duplex/triplex fashion.
>>>> The automatic pressure controls will be difficult either way so maybe sync
>>>> the baby for lag 2 seeing yard pressures will probably be down 75-100 PSI 
>>>> at
>>>> that point.
>>>> I doesn't appear much has been done here in 10 years and it's an FM job
>>>> which is surprising.
>>>> I do have some thoughts about PLD and possibly a lower pressure on the
>>>> replacement for the remaining original but can't make a move until someone
>>>> smarter than me looks at what's on the other end of that 150 PSI yard main
>>>> and huge building full of paper.
>>>> I've also reached out to the local shop who replaced 2 of them but not
>>>> getting much response.
>>>> I'll keep the list updated.
>>>> TD
>> 
>>>> I'll ask another question. How many and what size pumps are required to 
>>>> meet
>>>> the sprinkler demand?
>> 
>>>> Todd G Williams, PE
>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> It occurs to me you are looking for answers not questions-- I'll run 
>>>>> back up to the nosebleed section now and just spectate
>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Shouldn't the order of operation be farthest from tank, middle, closest
>>>> to tank? Especially if farthest is weakest?
>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 8:30 PM, "J. Scott Mitchell, PE"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> 100% guess, but the first two may be intended to support the fire
>>>> sprinkler system in the building with the third one coming on late in a bad
>>>> game to support hose streams.
>> 
>>>>>>> Just a thought.
>> 
>>>>>>> J. Scott Mitchell, PE
>> 
>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>> 
>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Charles Thurston                          mailto:[email protected]
>> Systems Design Manager
>> NICET Certified
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to