I would encourage not embracing the defining examples that residential is life 
safety and storage is property protection and everything else is mushy 
in-between ground.  It’s the system type that dictates the objective.  All NFPA 
13 systems for all sprinkler types and for all occupancies and uses are 
considered both life safety and property protection.  

As for the confusion over 5.1.1 and 5.1.2, that text has been in the standard 
since Napoleon was a corporal.  That means if one wanted an exact explanation 
of what was meant, the folks that crafted this sentence are gone and the 
current batch could / might / probably (pick one) will have something different 
assigned to those words.  My interpretation has always been that the phrase 
occupancy hazard is a sprinkler term and does not address or influence the 
building design as dictated by the building code and their associated use of 
terms. 

The text in the annex has nothing to do with the issue of comparing what these 
2 sections are trying to say.  Notice the asterisk is on the title 5.1. so it’s 
discussing the assignment of an occupancy classification.  It rightly points 
out that an office is generally a light hazard occupancy but there can and will 
be areas that exceed the fuel load for LH.  As such, that area would be a 
higher occupancy hazard classification.

As Galen commented, it is unfortunate that the term occupancy was included.  
Calling it simply X hazard classification would have worked just fine but 
changing it now would take an act of congress.  Ummm they may actually be 
willing to look at this since they aren’t doing anything else of significance.

As a member of NFPA 13, I probably should add the TC caveat that this is not to 
be considered a formal interpretation of NFPA or any of its technical 
committees but just my humble opinion.  Well opinion anyways.

Roland

Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org





On Mar 10, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yups. If it's not Residential or Storage, it's too mushy.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to