Yeah, but that's the text of an annex section that isn't a part of any adopted code or referenced standard. I guess my question could be rephrased to include asking why this language or illustration are in the standard. OH sidewalls obviously make more sense.
SL -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad Casterline Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Fig. A.8.15.7 because the text says "...should extend down at a 45 degree angle."??? -----Original Message----- From: Steve Leyton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Fig. A.8.15.7 Anyone out there, committee members or clairvoyants, who can say why this illustration shows a dry-pendent sprinkler in what appears to be a non-conforming orientation? Thanks, SML _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
