Yeah, but what about

8.16.4.1.5     Water-filled piping shall be permitted to be installed in
areas where the temperature is less than 40°F (4°C) when heat loss
calculations performed by a professional engineer verify that the system
will not freeze.


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sure, 8.4.9 Dry Sprinklers.
> 8.4.9.1 Where dry sprinklers are connected to wet pipe sprinkler systems
> protecting areas subject to freezing temperatures, the minimum exposed
> length of the barrel of the dry sprinkler shall be in accordance with Table
> 8.4.9.1.
>
> This section explicitly state where subject to freezing, and 38F isn't
> subject to freezing.  However, in my case the AHJ has interpreted in the
> past that if it's not maintained at or above 40F it's subject to freezing.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
> 208-318-3057
> www.Firebyknight.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> On Behalf Of IPA
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
>
> care to share?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Nix the last question, I just found the answer.
> >
> > Thank You,
> >
> > Bob Knight, CET III
> > 208-318-3057
> > www.Firebyknight.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > [email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Bob
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:09 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> >
> > 13 words it, in the section on dry pipe systems, at or above 40F.
> > Where do I find it that on a wet system that I don't need to apply the
> > temperature in the same way?
> >
> > Thank You,
> >
> > Bob Knight, CET III
> > 208-318-3057
> > www.Firebyknight.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > [email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of John Denhardt
> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:01 PM
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> >
> > Agree - we had done numerous cooler boxes and never have had an issue.
> > Usually the stored products will be damaged if they freeze.  In many
> > case, the refrigeration unit shuts down if the temperature drops below
> > a certain set temperature; 35 degree F is typical.
> >
> > Installing dry sprinklers where they are not required or necessarily
> > is not good fire protection in my opinion.
> >
> > John
> >
> > Fire sprinklers save lives
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:54 AM, "[email protected]"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Exactly, we do 38F coolers with ESFR's. Never had a ..., I better
> > > not say
> > that might jinx it.
> > > Ron F
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sprinklerforum
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > > John Denhardt
> > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:49 AM
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> > >
> > > If the area is not subject to freezing, no need for dry sprinklers.
> > > NFPA
> > 13 only requires dry sprinklers or other method when the area is
> > subject to freezing AND can not be readily maintained above 40 degrees F.
> > >
> > > The above is my personal opinion .....
> > >
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > Fire sprinklers save lives
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:42 AM, "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ron,
> > >> The temperature is maintained at 38F.  The sprinklers used were EC
> > >> OH SR dry sprinklers.
> > >>
> > >> Thank You,
> > >>
> > >> Bob Knight, CET III
> > >> 208-318-3057
> > >> www.Firebyknight.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Sprinklerforum
> > >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> > >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:37 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> > >>
> > >> A couple questions. If it is a cooler why do you need dry pendent
> > >> heads? And if it has to be dry heads and they are on a wet system
> > >> the RA could still be reduced couldn't it?
> > >>
> > >> Ron F
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Sprinklerforum
> > >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> On Behalf Of Bob
> > >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:29 AM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> > >>
> > >> Ron,
> > >> Yes this is a remodel adding only the cooler.  The existing ceiling
> > >> demand was well above the .2 need in the cooler.
> > >>
> > >> Thank You,
> > >>
> > >> Bob Knight, CET III
> > >> 208-318-3057
> > >> www.Firebyknight.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Sprinklerforum
> > >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> On Behalf Of rongreenman .
> > >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:11 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: Cooler Calc
> > >>
> > >> If the job is just the cooler then I think all the heads is
> > >> sufficient within the perimeter of the cooler. If it's a part of
> > >> the larger job you need to calc all the possible design areas. Not
> > >> knowing the layout I can't say but maybe the ceiling somewhere is a
> > >> design area, the cooler is potentially a design area, etc. But he's
> > >> nuts if he thinks you need to add other sprinklers not in the fire
> > >> area
> > to make the fire area be 1500 sqft.
> > >> Real is real. Math is math. Often the twin don't meet.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Mike Hill <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't suppose that you are lucky enough to have a fire rated
> cooler.
> > >>>
> > >>> Common sense would say that you calculate the cooler.
> > >>>
> > >>> Common practice would say calculate the cooler and/or a 1500 sq. ft.
> > >>> area outside of the cooler.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mike Hill
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > >>> [email protected]]
> > >>> On Behalf Of Bob
> > >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:47 PM
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> > >>>
> > >>> His stand is that I have one of three options that I have not used:
> > >>> (1) Density/area curves of Figure 11.2.3.1.1 in accordance with
> > >>> the density/area method of 11.2.3.2
> > >>> (2) The room that creates the greatest demand in accordance with
> > >>> the room design method of 11.2.3.3
> > >>> (3) Special design areas in accordance with 11.2.3.4
> > >>>
> > >>> Keep in mind that this is a jurisdiction that has told me in the
> > >>> past that you can't use the exceptions in 13 (this was before they
> > >>> became part of the body), and that they can't use common sense.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank You,
> > >>>
> > >>> Bob Knight, CET III
> > >>> 208-318-3057
> > >>> www.Firebyknight.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > >>> [email protected]]
> > >>> On Behalf Of Tim Stone
> > >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:41 AM
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Subject: RE: Cooler Calc
> > >>>
> > >>> The Cooler is a closed in room with a space above. You calculate
> > >>> all the heads inside the cooler if less than 1500 SF. If the area
> > >>> outside the cooler is fully sprinklered then you probably have
> > >>> performed calcs already. I'd ask the AHJ to review NFPA 13.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> G. Tim Stone
> > >>>
> > >>> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> > >>> NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler
> > >>> Design and Consulting Services
> > >>>
> > >>>               117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> > >>> CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
> > >>>                          [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > >>> [email protected]]
> > >>> On Behalf Of Bob
> > >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:12 PM
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Subject: Cooler Calc
> > >>>
> > >>> I have a 1,392 sf cooler.  I calc'ed the entire area of the cooler
> > >>> and submitted.  The AHJ is telling me that I need to calc
> > >>> additional sprinklers at the ceiling to have a 1500 sf design
> > >>> area.  I don't think I need to do this, I was looking at this as a
> > >>> separate fire area, and I don't see it being much different than
> > >>> not adding heads below ducts or other large obstructions.  Do I
> > >>> need to calc additional sprinklers at the ceiling for this
> application?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank You,
> > >>>
> > >>> Bob Knight, CET III
> > >>> 208-318-3057
> > >>> www.Firebyknight.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> > >>> in
> > >>> k
> > >>> l
> > >>> er.org
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> > >>> in
> > >>> k
> > >>> l
> > >>> er.org
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> > >>> in
> > >>> k
> > >>> l
> > >>> er.org
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> > >>> in
> > >>> k
> > >>> l
> > >>> er.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Ron Greenman
> > >> Instructor
> > >> Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College
> > >> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> > >> Tacoma, WA 98405
> > >>
> > >> [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> > >>
> > >> 253.680.7346
> > >> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> > >>
> > >> Member:
> > >> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC
> > >>
> > >> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations.
> > >> -Francis Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> > >>
> > >> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F.
> > >> Kettering, inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> > >> nk
> > >> l
> > >> er.org
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> > >> nk l er.org _______________________________________________
> > >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> > >> nk
> > >> l
> > >> er.org
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> > >> nk
> > >> l
> > >> er.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > > kl er.org _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > > kl
> > > er.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to