Cliff
I recall we changed this in the 2013 edition. I do not have in front of me but 
check that edition as well.
Pete

Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers Inc.
222 Capitol Court
Ocoee, FL 34761

Mobile: (407) 468-8248
Direct: (407) 877-5570
Fax: (407) 656-8026

www.waynefire.com



We’re hiring great people at all of our locations!  Please check out our 
website for the details!

________________________________________
From: Sprinklerforum [[email protected]] on behalf 
of Cliff Whitfield [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 4:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Sprinklers on 3" Pipe

This was bugging me so I had to stop and look it up.

NFPA 13 - 2010

8.6.5.2.1.8  "The requirements of 8.6.5.2.1.3 shall not apply to sprinkler
system piping less than 3 in. in diameter."

The commentary goes on to say that sprigs or riser nipples (or offsetting
the heads) are required on 3" and larger pipe.  This is for SSU heads.  Not
only Large Drop.

Cliff Whitfield, SET
President
Fire Design, Inc.
Ph: 719-488-3479



[email protected]
www.fire-design.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Parsley Consulting
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sprinklers on 3" Pipe

Cliff,
     I thought about that, however the only place I could find language like
that in the '07 was in the section on Large Drop sprinklers, which does not
apply to that model. Or maybe it does, it's just that I've been stuck on the
'13 edition for so long I'm a bit confused going backwards.  Could the V3404
be regarded as a CMSA/Large Drop?  The large drop tables I'm looking at in
my '07 edition show the CMSA as having specific pressure requirements, while
the V3404 clearly notes it can be used for storage in an area/density
method.
     Lots to think about.
*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, California 92025
*****Phone 760-745-6181*
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> *** On 9/19/2014 1:02
PM, Cliff Whitfield wrote:
> Ken,
>
> I assumed Jay was talking about having 3" lines without sprigs to the
> sprinklers.  I haven’t been where I could confirm in the book but I
> believe if this is what he's talking about, the heads would be
> required to be on sprigs.
>
> Cliff Whitfield, SET
> President
> Fire Design, Inc.
> Ph: 719-488-3479
>
>
>
> [email protected]
> www.fire-design.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Parsley Consulting
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 1:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Sprinklers on 3" Pipe
>
> I'm not sure Jay.  The tech sheet I looked at just now seems to
> suggest that in either the upright or pendent V3403 are listed for
> storage, when using density/area.  I looked at Victaulic sheet 40.20.
>
> Did you come across something else?
> *Ken Wagoner, SET
> *Parsley Consulting***
> *350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
> *Escondido, California 92025
> *****Phone 760-745-6181*
> Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> *** On 9/19/2014
> 11:36 AM, Jay Stough wrote:
>> I have a customer that is moving into a warehouse that was renovated
>> in 2013, using NFPA 13 (2007).  They have Victaulic 3403 upright
>> sprinklers directly on 3" pipe.  Unless I am missing something, I am
>> pretty sure this sprinkler is listed as a standard upright sprinkler
>> and cannot be
> installed
>> this way.  I have checked the spec sheet and appears to be a large
>> orifice standard spray sprinkler.  Am I correct or am I missing a
>> listing for this sprinkler?
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to