Here's the contrarian question - Do they really benefit the environment?  What 
may not be included in the analysis is the environmental cost to install them 
in the first place.  Somewhere ore and recycles need to be turned into 
products, then we need to design buildings and water supplies to support them.  
This has a cost.

Then the goal of fire suppression needs to be considered.  In many places it 
doesn't take much water to keep the neighbors building from catching on fire. 
That infrastructure doesn't cost much vs. stopping a fire in the room or object 
of origin.  What are the desired outcomes (with respect to environment)?

>From the FM report it looks like they only considered what the differences 
>were after the fire start not what it also takes to have sprinklers in the 
>first place.  

With falling fire rates to start with there is a point sprinklers are more 
costly to the environment to install everywhere.  In the extreme, if there is 
never a fire, sprinkler systems are incredibly environmentally expensive. In 
the other extreme all buildings burning frequently there is no question 
sprinkler are environmentally valuable. The issues is we are closer to no fires 
than a whole lot of fires.  Just a point to consider as I see more and more 
swaying from life and property being the value of sprinklers only to adding in 
this environmental aspect.  

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer 
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For





-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Wilder
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hide Those Sprinklers

http://www.iccsafe.org/gr/Documents/AdoptionToolkit/FM-Global-EnvironmenmtalImpactAutomaticFireSprinklers.pdf
Page 5 - Water and Pollution Data
97.8% less pollution
As high as 91%  less water in a fully sprinklered home 
http://www.fmglobal.com/page.aspx?id=04010300# Here as well if you are 
registered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtBafQdE9AM

Dan 
            

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hide Those Sprinklers

One other thing to mention from a conservation issue is water consumption and 
run-off.

I don't have the source off at my fingertips but I have read where firefighting 
in sprinklered buildings resulted in less water consumption than for 
non-sprinklered buildings due to the sprinklers being able to react quickly to 
a fire and thereby containing and controlling fire growth as opposed to a 
non-protected building where fire growth was not controlled up to the point in 
time where the FD is mobilized and prepared to manually begin control and 
extinguishment. 

Also the run-off from a sprinklered building is less than for a non-sprinklered 
bldg due to the above.

The article also spoke about airborne contaminants from non-sprinklered 
structures being greater than from a sprinklered structure.

The point was that sprinklered facilities help reduce emissions into the 
atmosphere, reduce water consumption and reduce contaminated water discharge.

These are all environmental benefits of Sprinklers that the Green Building Code 
has not addressed. 

Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Cahill, Christopher
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Hide Those Sprinklers

I'm presenting at the AIA convention this week.  The talk is on the IBC 
advantages and allowances with sprinklers.  For example, bigger and less costly 
construction when sprinklered.  One thing I want to also spend a very short 
time on is dispelling two myths, all sprinklers operate and aesthetics. I 
realize there are many myths and that could be a presentation in itself.  With 
a short window in the presentation I think all going off is a big one and 
aesthetics, well who but architects push the most on this?

I think I have the videos covered for how sprinklers do and don't operate.  Any 
further info I'd consider.

What I'm really lacking is on the aesthetics.  If you have any pictures of the 
work you are proud of where you hid the sprinklers from view effectively I'd 
love to show some.  About all I can do is give your company credit in the 
presentation.  This is someplace north of 100 architects from the greater 
Minnesota area. So that's your marketing target.

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.burnsmcd.com<http://www.burnsmcd.com/>
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For




_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to