Yes, I'm also referencing the ETL.  Have you had your opinion confirmed by
MED FPE?  I've never considered the ceiling slope provisions to be a density
issue.  So maybe I've been an overly conservative designer.

Bill Brooks 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Mark A. Sornsin, P.E.
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: day of questions - Hangars

Bill - as Chris just pointed out, The Air Force ETL (which this thread is
discussing) references NFPA 13, but not for design densities. Because the
ETL defines the design densities, you cannot get to the sloped ceiling
requirements of NFPA 13 because they fall under the design densities section
of 13, which we are not referencing. Apparently - absent the specific
requirement by the ETL to increase design areas - the Air Force considers
sloped ceiling to be a non-issue in a high-ex foam / overhead sprinkler
system design (or that it is adequately addressed with the 5,000 sq.ft.
design area).

Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection
Engineer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 |
http://www.kfiengineers.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Bill Brooks
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: day of questions - Hangars

I specify the area increase for the excessive slope.

Bill Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Scott A Futrell
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 2:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: day of questions - Hangars

This must be one of those design features of a hangar where the fire, the
building and the sprinkler system realize it isn't a NFPA 13 design and the
sprinklers operate differently (quicker and more effectively) with a slope
exceeding 2 in 12 then they do for a sprinkler system installed in a
different building with a slope exceeding 2 in 12, right?

We always require the thirty percent increase because why would it be any
different unless the original specified design area included the increase
already?

Scott

Office: (763) 425-1001x12
Cell: (612) 759-5556

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Mark A. Sornsin, P.E.
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: day of questions - Hangars

Chris - The ETL references NFPA 13 & 409 at the beginning; then under the
sprinkler design section (A1.3.1.1) it references NFPA 13. I don't see a
statement NOT to increase design areas (though my experience has been that
we do not on these Air Force jobs - just don't recall under what authority).

Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection
Engineer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 |
http://www.kfiengineers.com


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to