Yes, I am aware of this.  But it is possible to create a fire wall with
gypsumboard, and this is where the "collapse on both sides without damaging
the wall" comes into play.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Fire Wall Integrity

There are physical differences and penetration restrictions based on whether
the membrane is a Fire Wall or Fire Partition or other codified separation.


Craig L. Prahl 
Fire Protection Group Lead
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SCĀ  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Bill Brooks
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fire Wall Integrity

John, now that you bring up the subject of collapse on both sides, just how
do you treat this subject?  I have seen the interpretation which appears to
suggest that a sprinkler pipe penetration of a fire wall would not be
acceptable if the pipe (in coming down with collapsing side) somehow
compromised the gypsumboard separation assembly.  Same with an electrical
conduit.  I'm also not sure how to design the collapsing side in such a way
that it falls cleanly to the ground without some member shifting sideways
and penetrating the separating assembly.

In other words, do you wait till after the fire to say it works or doesn't
work?

Bill Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Floor Control Stations

LOL Horizontal Fire Wall......we inspectors are still scratching our heads
how this meets the performance definition of a firewall...collapse on one
side, stays in place....then again sprinkler guys are famous for skyhooks.
You just can't make this stuff up.

John Drucker - Mobile Email
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cell/Text 732-904-6823


"rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:

Roland,

Would you think with all the hoopla about non-combustible floor assemblies
being equivalent to horizontal fire walls. and high rises typically not
needing vertical fire separation, that a floor would fit a loose definition
of a zone? Two floors, even if within the area limits of a single system
seem to define two zones. Just thinking, and remember that Leyton was
concerned this morning that my meds have lost their efficacy, so I may just
be having another flashback to the sixties.


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:00 PM, David Blackwell <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On a related note and of interest to this forum should be the change 
> to next section, IFC 914.3.1.2, in the 2015 edition.  The limiting 
> phrase "In buildings that are more than 420 feet (128m) in building 
> height," has been added to the 2015 edition published by ICC.  Prior 
> to that change, the 2012 edition applied the separate supply piping 
> requirement per IFC 914.3.1.2 more broadly to include high-rise 
> buildings
below that height.
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
> David W. S. Blackwell, II, PE, CFPE, CFI I Chief Engineer Office of 
> State Fire Marshal SC Department of Labor, Licensing, & Regulation,
> 141 Monticello Trail, Columbia, SC 29203
> Telephone: 803.896.9800 [Office] 803.896.9833 [Direct]
> Fax: 803.896.9806 [Office]
> Email:   [email protected]
> Website:  http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
>
>
> Please note that you can sign up to receive automatic information on 
> SC Division of Fire and Life Safety current events, policies, laws and 
> procedures by visiting our Web site at:
> http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland 
> Huggins
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Floor Control Stations
>
> The main point is that for standard high rises, the codes and 
> standards only require a single riser.
>
> Very Tall High Rises (>420 ft) are a unique beast.  The IFC requires 
> these tall buildings to have 2 risers per zone.  Not 100% sure but I 
> don't think they mean each floor is a zone.  The same section says 
> "Each riser shall supply sprinklers on alternate floors".  A lot of 
> these building going up in parts of the Middle East but not hearing about
any here in the USA.
Any
> one involved with one?
>
> Roland
>
>
> Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
> Dallas, TX
> http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:55 AM, David Blackwell
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > It is also found in Section 914.3.1.1 of the 2012 IFC, which is
> referenced from 2012 IFC Table 903.2.11.6 [Additional Required Fire 
> Suppression Systems].
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> >
> > David W. S. Blackwell, II, PE, CFPE, CFI I Chief Engineer Office of 
> > State Fire Marshal SC Department of Labor, Licensing, & Regulation,
> > 141 Monticello Trail, Columbia, SC 29203
> > Telephone: 803.896.9800 [Office] 803.896.9833 [Direct]
> > Fax: 803.896.9806 [Office]
> > Email:   [email protected]
> > Website:  http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
> >
> >
> > Please note that you can sign up to receive automatic information on 
> > SC Division of Fire and Life Safety current events, policies, laws 
> > and procedures by visiting our Web site at:
> > http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Fairchild, Jack
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 12:15 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Floor Control Stations
> >
> > IBC 2009/2012  -  403.3.1  Buildings in excess of 420 feet in height.
> >
> > Jack Fairchild
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Dale Wingard
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 11:45 AM
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: Floor Control Stations
> >
> > Jeremy,
> >
> > I believe that is just a Marriott requirement.
> >
> > Dale F. Wingard  SET
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Jeremy Frazier
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 10:38 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Floor Control Stations
> >
> > Where in NFPA/IBC does it say that if you have 2 standpipes, your 
> > sprinkler system should connect to both standpipes?  I've looked 
> > through 14 (2010),13
> > (2010) and IBC (2009)  and I have not found anything requiring it.  
> > Is
> this one of those things like electrical rooms with 2 penetrations or 
> is there and actual code?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeremy Frazier
> >
> > P:571-931-1004
> > F:571-931-1010
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl er.org _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl er.org _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to