Of course someone had a phone out.. Picture of the fire at the end and bottom 
of a rack.  Haven't read if the picture has been confirmed but the media is 
running with it.

http://www.lex18.com/story/28727199/shelter-in-place-ordered-lifted-in-louisville-as-crews-contain-massive-ge-fire
http://www.14news.com/story/28713538/emergency-crews-responding-to-fire-at-ge-appliance-park

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 7:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GE fire COMMENT

Ladies/Gentlemen:
 
I watched NBC News that night and they stated it may have  started with a 
lightning strike on the roof...My conjecture: Possibly igniting insulating foam 
below roof deck...and, above the  sprinklers?? Your thoughts, por favor?
 
Jerry
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
 
Jerry D. Watts, SFPE
President & Co-Founder
ACCENT FIRE ENGINEERING INT'L. Ltd.*
Santa Fe, New Mexico USA
(800) 503.1961 nationwide
 
*Licensed Fire Protection Engineers -  Architects/Inspectors/Fire 
Investigators: AZ  CA  CO  NM   NV  NY  TX  UT  KS  MD  MS
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/6/2015 8:22:11 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

A  terrible fire but blessing no one was hurt.

They had another fire a few  weeks before contained by sprinklers in a 
different section of the business  park:  
http://www.whas11.com/story/news/local/2015/03/19/crews-working-fire-at-ge-appliances/25054443/

Ironic  the tenant, Derby Industries, makes mattress specifically for fire 
houses



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad  
Casterline
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:02 AM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: RE: GE fire

Derby  Industries:

http://www.derbyindustries.com/ecommerce/products.cfm?item=Corrections-Jail-
Mattresses-c84

>From  Maurice:

"It appears from a 2012 report that the site (and particular  building) was 
sprinkler protected, however there were recommendations to  improve the 
protection arrangement and the arrangement of the water  supply".

If I had to guess, I would say the stored commodity was other  than originally 
designed for!!!

Brad 

-----Original  Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Jack  Cahit Kilavuz
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:29 AM
To:  [email protected]
Subject: Re: GE fire

FM  brought the plastics in construction issue many years ago, developed a 
corner  test, showed sprinklers designed for occupany may not be adequate for 
foam  insuated buildings.
The building in the pictures appear very similar to  meatworks, bakery and 
dairy buildings I visited the "day after", hence if the  sprinklers are only 
based on NFPA basic manufacturing activity they may not be  able to contain 
such a fire.

Of course this is after all previous  comments: that the sprinkler should be 
adequate for occupancy, should be  properly fitted and professionally 
maintained and provided with  adequate/reliable water supply.

Jack
+973 33468488

On 6 April  2015 at 15:36, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Obviously  something wasn't up to par.  One picture taken by an 
> employee  before exiting showed a pretty significant fire in its early 
> stage  but no sprinkler discharge.
>
> I've dealt with projects where  there were sprinklers present but 
> either the system was impaired or  incorrectly designed for the 
> occupancy such
that
> the fire  resulted in a total loss of property.
>
> So just because there  are sprinklers hanging from the steel doesn't 
> mean the building is  actually sprinklered.
>
>
>
> Craig L. Prahl
>  Fire Protection Group Lead
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
>  1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct -  864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension   74102
> [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original  Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>  [email protected]] On Behalf Of Maurice  
> Marvi
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:23 AM
> To:  [email protected]
> Subject: re: GE  fire
>
> I had a chance to look up this location.
> It  appears from a 2012 report that the site (and particular building)  
> was sprinkler protected, however there were recommendations to improve 
> the protection arrangement and the arrangement of the water  supply.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> From:  "Karen Lesko"
> Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 4:12 PM
> To:  [email protected]
> Subject: GE  fire
>
> I have read several reports about the GE Warehouse fire  and none of 
> them have mentioned if the warehouse was  sprinklered.  Have any of 
> you seen
that
> info?
>  _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing  list
>  [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing  list
>  [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing  list
>  [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>  _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing  list
>  [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to