Absolutely--- Good stuff you-- Bad stuff me-- I have conditioned myself that way On Dec 18, 2015 3:34 PM, "Todd Williams" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brad, so I can blame your mind for the things that come out of my mouth? > Sweet! > > Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT > 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell) > Sent using CloudMagic [ > https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > The strangest thing! I said something and it came out Todd's mouth. > No more posting from Applebee's! > (Nurse, another eggnog please) > On Dec 18, 2015 2:16 PM, "Brad Casterline" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't believe there is a prohibition, but if you take 2 heads off one > > outlet, > > you had better verify it hydraulically. > > > > Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT > > 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell) > > Sent using CloudMagic [ > > https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, [email protected] > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was always taught when doing an upfit you only replace 1 for 1, meaning > > if > > here was 1 existing head on an arm-over you couldn't say add another > "new" > > head > > and now be feeding 2 heads off that same arm-over, otherwise you'd have > to > > add a > > new arm-over to the branchline for the new head. Now that may have come > > from a > > spec long long ago but I swore it was also in NFPA, however I don't see > it > > worded that way in the standard. Any help? > > > > Brian Harris, CET > > BVS Systems Inc. > > Sprinkler Division > > bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/> > > Phone: 704.896.9989 > > Fax: 704.896.1935 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > I've seen wording too. I think it is related to above/below, 1/2 nip > > permissible (unless seismic), etc, it's involved, but it's there > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
