Low suction pressures aggravate water pollution is the argument.

That's why we have BFP devices.
Do fire dept. Pumper operators worry about suction psi?


Art Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection/Tiroly
24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Oversized fire pump

So the essence of that regulation is to preserve the ability to flush the
toilet at the expense of fighting a fire and saving a life. 

Mark at Aero
602 820-7894

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Art Tiroly
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Oversized fire pump

In Ohio we are required to provide a low suction control panel that will
shut the pump off and sound an alarm.
Later we now must provide a pressure sustaining valve that throttles the
fire pump discharge flow to maintain a predetermined low suction pressure 10
psi on the suction to protect the public water pressure


Art Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection
24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oversized fire pump

Mark,
The 18 psi suction pressure is at the suction flange of the pump. There is
friction loss in the underground piping and BFP so the pressure at the
street will be greater. Given we have a steep curve (90 static and goes to 0
at
1900
gpm) and the size of the pump (1500 at 85), I am concerned if we have a big
draw in an uncontrolled situation, unlike a pump test, do we have the
potential of a serious problem.

Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell)
Sent using CloudMagic
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM, [email protected]
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Todd,
When you talk about drawing the suction pressure down to 20 psi, is your
reference point at the pump suction gauge, or at the connection to the city
water main?
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894

-----Original Message-----
 From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oversized fire pump

No the water supply was the same. Not sure where this came from but could be
an IOR mistake.

Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell)
Sent using CloudMagic
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:46 AM, [email protected]
<[email protected]>
wrote:
It may have been sized correctly in 2009 but the municipal water supply has
degraded since then.

Suction control valve is the way to go to fix the problem. That will keep
the supply from being drawn down below 20 psi.

Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC 29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension 74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
 From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Oversized fire pump

I am working on a facility with a fire pump that was oversized for the
available public water supply. The pump is 1500 gpm at 85 psi. At 1500 gpm,
the suction pressure drops to 18 psi. This is characteristic of the water
supply and is not due to a shut valve or other obstruction. The pump was
installed in 2009.
Are
there any safeguards that I should recommend for this situation?

Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell)
Sent using CloudMagic
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2]
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to