But I guess I like to push design and review issues as far to front of project as possible.
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 12:50, Bruce Verhei <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd take care of outlet in roof or not during building review. > > "How" should be only issues at standpipe design. > > >> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:39, Matthew J Willis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Why a truck? >> >> Your original post indicated a hatch. I've climbed thru many with hose and a >> monster..... >> >> R/ >> Matt >> >> Matthew J. Willis >> Project Manager >> Rapid Fire Protection Inc. >> *NEW ADDRESS* >> 1530 Samco Road >> Rapid City, SD 57702 >> Office-605.348.2342 >> Direct Line-605.593.5063 >> Cell-605.391.2733 >> Fax:-605.348.0108 >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Travis Mack >> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 11:36 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: STANDPIPE >> >> Yes. If you are going to test the standpipe as required then you either need >> to bring a pump, or you coordinate with the fire department to have a truck >> brought out for testing. >> >> It is in the best interest of the FD to coordinate with these tests. >> Remember, the end user of the standpipe system is the responding FD. >> >> I've seen many jurisdictions where these tests never get done. And, I've >> seen some where the FD is very active in having these done. >> >> >> >> Travis Mack, SET >> MFP Design, LLC >> "Follow" us on Facebook: >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 >> Send large files to MFP Design via: >> https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Troy schieckoff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So we need to ladder a 5 story building to run a test on the system? >>> Can you direct me to where it says it is just a test connection. I >>> haven't seen that. Thanks >>> >>> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. >>> Original Message >>> From: Steve Leyton >>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 1:28 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Reply To: [email protected] >>> Subject: RE: STANDPIPE >>> >>> Don't forget that it's intended to be used as a test connection, and any >>> fire fighting water supply applications are subjective and up to the >>> responding Fire Department. >>> >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: "rongreenman ." <[email protected]> >>> Date: 3/25/2016 11:26 AM (GMT-07:00) >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: STANDPIPE >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc. >>> < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> . With all the facts about light weight truss construction. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm curious if this building is wood framed, or with an unsprinklered >>> combustible attic space, etc., where there would be a increased >>> concern, more than usual, about being on the roof. Again, I'm only >>> curious and not challenging any interpretation. I'm just not seeing >>> the problem but I haven't been around actual construction for some >>> time and am somewhat unfamiliar with what's in the field these days. >>> >>> -- >>> Ron Greenman >>> Instructor >>> Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College >>> 1101 So. Yakima Ave. >>> Tacoma, WA 98405 >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/ >>> >>> 253.680.7346 >>> 253.576.9700 (cell) >>> >>> Member: >>> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC >>> >>> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis >>> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626) >>> >>> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering, >>> inventor and engineer (1876-1958) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl >>> er.org _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl >>> er.org _______________________________________________ >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl >>> er.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
