You wouldn't want to use a round one since spacing is determined by LxW. Rectangles are your friend (square in this case).
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote: > I like Tony's idea of a template but what if you used a round one with > radius=7.5 feet and used it at A,B,C,D in all three examples? > On Jun 10, 2016 2:58 PM, "Parsley Consulting" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'll chime in as well. >> >> Example 3 is closer to being correct, as the sprinklers at B and C aren't >> more than 7'-6" from a wall, measured perpendicular to the wall. >> >> The error, to me, is the distance of 21'-2½" between B and C. I don't >> see how that would be allowable, even if you were using extended coverage >> sprinklers. Table 8.8.2.1.2 limits the distance between such sprinklers, >> with the maximum being 20'-0" in OH and LH occupancies. >> >> I don't see how that would be allowed. >> >> *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting* >> >> >> >> * 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 Escondido, California 92025 Phone >> 760-745-6181 <760-745-6181> Visit our website >> <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * >> On 06/10/2016 12:51 PM, Ben Young wrote: >> >> Agreed Tony. >> >> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Tony Eggster < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> #2 & #3 are both wrong. >>> >>> #2 is spaced too far, measured perpendicularly, from the angled wall. >>> >>> #3 will require an additional sprinkler between B and C. If you draw a >>> 15X15 square template on your drawings you will see an obvious void of >>> sprinkler coverage requiring protection. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, James Litvak <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The problem with A.8.6.3.2.3 is that it only shows the one >>>> sprinkler. What I'm concerned about is the distance between sprinklers B >>>> and C. In example 3 all the sprinklers are spaced correctly from the walls >>>> but B and C are 21'-2 1/2" apart. The way I understand it, they still need >>>> to be 15'-0" along that wall, even though they're spaced correctly from >>>> every wall. Is that correct? >>>> >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, June 10, 2016, Brian Harris <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Check out A.8.6.3.2.3 it should shed some light on it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Brian Harris, CET* >>>>> >>>>> BVS Systems Inc. >>>>> >>>>> bvssytemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: >>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James >>>>> Litvak >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 1:45 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Angled Wall Spacing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am wondering if I've been thinking about sprinkler spacing along >>>>> angled walls properly. What I mean is walls not at a right angle. The PDF >>>>> I >>>>> made in the link below really helps explain it. In example 1, four heads >>>>> are spaced correctly at 225 sq. ft. In examples 2 and 3 one of the walls >>>>> is >>>>> angled. My question is, are either example 2 or 3 correct, or are they >>>>> both >>>>> wrong? My thought is that example 2 is incorrect, and for example 3 to be >>>>> correct there would need to be an additional sprinkler along the angled >>>>> wall between sprinklers B and C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0> >>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fg0l79rtwbawne/Angled%20Wall%20Spacing.pdf?dl=0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> James >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Benjamin Young >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
