Re: Extended Coverage Heads

Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:56:31 -0700

I just do what they ask me to do. They wanted ec heads. I personally would have used standard qr

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Travis Mack, SET
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Extended Coverage Heads

Yeah.  Never said anything if it was a good idea.  Just more of the concepts involved.

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:[email protected]

http://www.mfpdesign.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign 
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack
On 6/28/2016 8:44 AM, Vince Sabolik wrote:
.... so, what you wind up with is a .60 light hazard job!

I was told that because of expen$e, the half-foot dimensions weren't tested which
would have allowed us to use these in 14x16, etc. schemes.

Anybody else told that?
 

11351 Pearl Road / Strongsville, Ohio 44136 Phone 440 238-4800 Fax 440 238-4876 Cell 440 724-7601

Vince Sabolik 



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to