Is this a duplex or does the local authority require the 5 gpm? 13D only
requires it if you have more than one dwelling unit and not for a common
supply line feeding both domestic and the fire sprinkler system.



On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Bruce Verhei <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm going to cross from application of current standards to comment on
> standards.
>
> I've seen 13-D, and 13-R, operate a number of times well outside original
> design criteria, and alway successfully. By successful, living spaces
> stayed survivable. There may have been considerable fire outside the unit,
> and attic may have been fully involved.
>
> I wonder where water source is municipal, effectively unlimited, source we
> should just accept that some times the clothes washer or lawn sprinklers
> are on.
>
> Are a flow switch and 120V alarm, installed, cheaper than $600?
>
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 15:02, Bruce Verhei <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I sure wouldn't want a solenoid valve cutoff, listed or not.
>
> When the grid is down I still enjoy the use of modern plumbing supplied by
> a municipal water system.  Take it away every time power is off for a day
> or two and solenoid valve would be disabled or removed by owners.
>
> Mechanical valve is best for a reason.
>
> Best
>
> Bruce Verhei
>
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 11:25, <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Or use a solenoid valve that is energized open and let the flow switch
> break the circuit. If/when the valve fails, it *will* get fixed.
>
>
>
> Mark at Aero
>
> 602 820-7894
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [
> mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Steve
> Leyton
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 10:57 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: Solenoid Valve for domestic side of 13D system riser
>
>
>
> What’s easier, more cost-effective and (most important) more failsafe and
> reliable in light of the fact that this product will NEVER be ITM’d after
> it’s installed?    I assume you’re designing to an undersized meter.
> Either get relief from the water agency to add the 5 GPM to the
> intermittent flow rate of the sprinklers (as opposed to the continuous flow
> for which the meter is rated) or have the owner bite the bullet and buy a
> larger meter?
>
>
>
> I’m sure there are people who will disagree with me, but relying on an
> electrical device that is not subject to regular exercise or inspection
> isn’t my idea of reliable.
>
>
>
> SL
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [
> mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Owen
> Evans
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 10:45 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Solenoid Valve for domestic side of 13D system riser
>
>
>
> Hi Don,
>
>
>
> Thanks for responding. I checked out the RSV-1 from Tyco and the list
> price is $1,000.00. I about fell out of my chair. It is on the sprinkler
> riser with a branch off to the domestic. When fire sprinklers flow the
> pressure change causes the valve to shut off the domestic. It is
> non-electric, maybe that is why it is so expensive. It has been years but
> the one I have seen was a simple solenoid valve that is attached to the
> domestic water and simply closes when it receives an electric current from
> the activated flow switch.  HELP anybody!
>
>
>
> Owen Evans
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Casey <[email protected]>
> To: sprinklerforum <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wed, Aug 3, 2016 10:20 am
> Subject: RE: Solenoid Valve for domestic side of 13D system riser
>
> Check out Tyco’s RSV-1 valve
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [
> mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]?>] *On Behalf Of *Owen
> Evans
> *Sent:* 2016/08/03 1:17 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Solenoid Valve for domestic side of 13D system riser
>
>
>
> Hello Folks,
>
>
>
> Anybody have a source in southern California where I can get a 1" electric
> solenoid valve to shut off domestic flow (activated by the flow switch)?
> This is so I can eliminate the 5 gpm from the 13D calculations.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Owen Evans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to