Does it make a difference? And if so, how? I only ask because discussing
with coworkers the idea is that any equipment changes an attic from unused
to used, so it doesn't qualify as light hazard anymore.

James


On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Todd Williams <fpdcdes...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It depends. Fuel fired equipment?
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
> 860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> via Newton Mail
> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=9.1.21&pv=9.3.5&source=email_footer_2>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:09 PM, James Litvak <jameslit...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jameslit...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Would an attic with mechanical equipment in it be considered light or
> ordinary hazard?
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to