Thanks Ken, the way you phrased your response I thought I had miss something 
the last several years. 
Cheers!
Owen

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 23, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Parsley Consulting <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Owen,
>     for at least the last fifteen years that has been the case.
> Ken Wagoner, SET
> Parsley Consulting
> 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
> Escondido, California 92025
> Phone 760-745-6181
> Visit our website
>> On 01/23/2017 10:40 AM, Owen Evans wrote:
>> Hello Ken, thanks for responding.
>> 
>> So California adopts the IFC with California amendments and then calls it 
>> the CFC, correct?
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Parsley Consulting <[email protected]>
>> To: sprinklerforum <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Mon, Jan 23, 2017 10:27 am
>> Subject: Re: PIV Supervion, lock or tamper switch?
>> 
>> Owen,
>> 
>>     The California Fire Code is very specific, and it would seem unambiguous 
>> for the conditions you describe.  
>> 903.4 Sprinkler system supervision and alarms. All valves controlling the 
>> water supply for automatic sprinkler systems, pumps, tanks, water levels and 
>> temperatures, critical air pressures and water-flow switches on              
>>          all sprinkler systems shall be electrically supervised by a listed 
>> fire alarm control unit. 
>> Exceptions:
>> 1. Automatic sprinkler systems protecting one- and two-family dwellings.
>> Doesn't apply to the buildings you've described
>> 
>> 2. Limited area systems serving fewer than 20 sprinklers.
>> Doesn't apply to the buildings you've described
>> 
>> 3. Automatic sprinkler                         systems installed in 
>> accordance with NFPA 13R where a common supply main is used to supply both 
>> domestic water and the automatic sprinkler system, and a separate shutoff 
>> valve for the automatic sprinkler system is not provided.
>> Depending on the underground supply, might or might not apply
>> 
>> 4. Jockey pump control valves that are sealed or locked in the open position.
>> Doesn't apply to the PIV
>> 
>> 5. Control valves to commercial kitchen hoods, paint spray booths or dip 
>> tanks that are sealed or locked in the open position.
>> Doesn't apply to the PIV
>> 
>> 6. Valves controlling the fuel supply to fire pump engines that are sealed 
>> or locked in the open position.
>> Doesn't apply to the PIV
>> 
>> 7. Trim valves to pressure switches in dry, preaction and deluge sprinkler 
>> systems that are sealed or locked in the open position.
>> Doesn't apply to the PIV
>>     It does appear, based entirely on the information you've provided, that 
>> electrical supervision is required for the PIV.
>> 
>>     And, not to split hairs or to be pedantic, California is not under the 
>> regulations in the 2013 IFC.  California, as it does with almost everything, 
>> has made it's own modifications to that document and has issued the 2013 
>> California Fire Code, which has as of January 1 been replaced with the 2016 
>> edition of the CFC.      
>>  
>>     Chapter 80 of that document contains a list of the applicable editions 
>> of various standards and codes, including the NFPA documents.  Further, that 
>> chapter of the CFC contains language on changes to the NFPA documents.  As 
>> an example - in California, the reduction of the remote area size for use of 
>> quick response sprinklers in an area with a ceiling height of 20' or less is 
>> not allowed in ordinary hazard occupancies, even though NFPA 13 does allow 
>> that reduction.  
>> 
>>      I've had to deal with some terribly angry contractors who were unaware 
>> of those provisions.  They've said some pretty creative and hostile things 
>> when I've pointed them out, including some I'm sure aren't true, as I have a 
>> photo of my parents' wedding, and it was 14 years before I was born!
>> 
>> sincerely,
>> Ken Wagoner, SET
>> Parsley Consulting
>> 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
>> Escondido, California 92025
>> Phone 760-745-6181
>> Visit our website
>> 
>> On 01/23/2017 9:25 AM, Owen Evans wrote:
>> As most of you know, I work exclusively with 13D systems. I do on occasion 
>> get questions on the big boy systems, 13 and 13R.  The property in question 
>> is a boutique hotel, two buildings.                           One building 
>> is a two story, fifty room hotel and the other building is two story, 
>> restaurant on the first floor and banquet facility on second floor with a 
>> roof deck. Each building has a FDC and a PIV. I am in California which is 
>> under the 2013 IFC.
>> 
>> I recently had the question asked "does the PIV require electrical 
>> supervision?"  NFPA states a lock is adequate, the 2013 IFC states 
>> electrical supervision is required, with exceptions. I get different answers 
>> form different people. I'm thinking it's the more restrictive  2013 IFC. 
>> Which is it?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Owen Evans
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to