This becomes a class 5 backflow (BFP)application. RPZ is necessary for protecting the potable water supply.
Your system now has additives.

Is the (BFP) for the A/F loop(S) only? If it is, then a check is not _generally_ necessary.
You need a listed expansion tank, with service valve in any case.

But, to be smart, If you have significant volume of A/F solution in the system, you should take into account future backflow repairs and shut off valve failures. Plus, how about forward flow test of the BFP?

Solution to all that:
After the BFP, have a properly sized drain connection outlet with valve with respect to the size of the service. Make a Gauge provision, then go into a regular swing check (no hole) to contain the A/F solution solely.
The UL expansion tank and service valve is after the swing check.
Also, another drain valve on the solution side for filling and draining.

It is more equipment, but it will save a lot of future maintenance problems in testing and repair and not diluting the A/F mixture. Mind you, very few people look that far ahead to the repair issues associated with BFP's and A/F loops.

If the system side of the BFP feeds a wet sprinkler system as well as the A/F loop, the check with hole you described, and associated shut off and drain valves are needed. Here you need to follow the pipe arrangements in the standard.

Mark Walker
WALKER SPRINKLER CO.

On 1/28/2017 1:43 AM, Douglas Hicks wrote:
We have a building with 2 outside canopies, each is protected by an antifreeze loop. The sprinkler system has a backflow in a pit. Do each of the 2 antifreeze loops need a one way swing check valve, with a hole in the clapper? I will put a test port at each end of both loops, even though the loops are not 150 gallons.


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to